Re: Selection criteria for an in-memory analysis solution
From: joel garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 17:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2e8b3ab4-914f-41d9-9963-55bba8e5accb_at_h37g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
On May 12, 4:56 pm, John Hurley <hurleyjo..._at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> Joel:
>
> > My reality, and I would guess it is fairly common, is that there is a
> > lot of crap out there trying to get off on my server. So to speak.
>
> Well you lost me again but maybe I really don't want to know more
> here. "Getting off on your server?" ...
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 17:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2e8b3ab4-914f-41d9-9963-55bba8e5accb_at_h37g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
On May 12, 4:56 pm, John Hurley <hurleyjo..._at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> Joel:
>
> > My reality, and I would guess it is fairly common, is that there is a
> > lot of crap out there trying to get off on my server. So to speak.
>
> Well you lost me again but maybe I really don't want to know more
> here. "Getting off on your server?" ...
Referring to BI programs that do really dumb things, because they are MS-think like "duuuhhhh, get everything off server then aggregate," but the details would be talking out of school.
>
> I really have to buy you a beer sometime. Are you going to be at Open
> World this year? I have not made it for a couple of years but this
> year it looks likely.
Naw, I wish, but very unlikely.
jg
-- _at_home.com is bogus. http://www.cnn.com/2010/TRAVEL/05/06/tsa.scanner.assault/index.htmlReceived on Wed May 12 2010 - 19:30:03 CDT