Re: Oracle does it again
From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:50:26 +1100
Message-ID: <hmdhht$2fj$1_at_news.eternal-september.org>
Mladen Gogala wrote,on my timestamp of 28/02/2010 12:12 PM:
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:50:26 +1100
Message-ID: <hmdhht$2fj$1_at_news.eternal-september.org>
Mladen Gogala wrote,on my timestamp of 28/02/2010 12:12 PM:
> for the right job applies here. Other databases are getting better and
> better and they can do more and more. One needs Oracle RDBMS only to do
> the heavy lifting, smaller stuff can be done by other databases. RAC is
> the only reason to go for Oracle RDBMS and not for something much, much
Where I work:
- Oracle dbs: 3, with development instances.
- Non-Oracle, mostly SQL Server: 9, with 3 additional development. That's after consolidation: previously we had 6 Oracle and >35 SQL Server.
Need I say more?
I just have to laugh when the Oracle reps come in and ask if I'm using grid to "manage *all* my Oracle dbs".... Received on Sun Feb 28 2010 - 04:50:26 CST