Re: Replication
From: ddf <oratune_at_msn.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <69110bcd-dbda-4d54-99c3-75d065899600_at_v2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
On Sep 15, 7:15 pm, The Magnet <a..._at_unsu.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to learn about this Advanced Replication. I've already got
> a headache. Trying to understand these replication groups and master
> groups and materialized view sites from master group sites, etc. I
> just do not get it.
>
> But anyways, my question is this: I read that you can have a
> asynchronous replication but you can simulate continuous pushing of
> transactions. Why not use synchronous then? Or I I totally lost?
>
> Thanks!
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <69110bcd-dbda-4d54-99c3-75d065899600_at_v2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
On Sep 15, 7:15 pm, The Magnet <a..._at_unsu.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to learn about this Advanced Replication. I've already got
> a headache. Trying to understand these replication groups and master
> groups and materialized view sites from master group sites, etc. I
> just do not get it.
>
> But anyways, my question is this: I read that you can have a
> asynchronous replication but you can simulate continuous pushing of
> transactions. Why not use synchronous then? Or I I totally lost?
>
> Thanks!
Not to be contrary but you should probably shift over to reading about Streams replication as the old Advanced Replcation is outdated.
David Fitzjarrell Received on Tue Sep 15 2009 - 20:02:23 CDT