Re: Oracle 10 Failover

From: Chris Seidel <cseidel_at_arcor.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:44:47 +0200
Message-ID: <48c8159e$0$18736$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>

sybrandb_at_hccnet.nl wrote:

> I wouldn't consider client side failover using any form of
> replication.

Why not if the data doesn't have to be "brand new"?

> Client side failover applies to Dataguard or RAC, not Streams or CDC.

RAC uses a single database. So RAC alone is not an option for a distributed environment. In a distr. env. I need RAC + Data Guard, right? Received on Wed Sep 10 2008 - 13:44:47 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: joel garry: "Re: Inserting/Updating Unicode Data"
Previous message: emdproduction_at_hotmail.com: "RMAN encryption or TDE"
In reply to: sybrandb_at_hccnet.nl: "Re: Oracle 10 Failover"
Next in thread: sybrandb_at_hccnet.nl: "Re: Oracle 10 Failover"
Reply: sybrandb_at_hccnet.nl: "Re: Oracle 10 Failover"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message