Path: text.usenetserver.com!out02b.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in02.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!postnews.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Alexander Skwar Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server Subject: Re: EXP Parameters to take backup of 110 GB database Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 13:56:59 +0200 Organization: n/a Lines: 22 Message-ID: <1361055.I3HenKkt9i@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> References: <1186132382.376323.240380@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <1186148499.697810@bubbleator.drizzle.com> <2751042.vlyJi0tCCS@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> <1186501245.384043@bubbleator.drizzle.com> Reply-To: antworten@alexander.skwar.name Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: individual.net x3EdYqdqk9xRJKbXPG/j1Qk9xzuORVtT6f53U9uq5rUxqNND8= Cancel-Lock: sha1:tFOYY1xLGT1z2HOp4d47ZBglrHQ= User-Agent: KNode/0.10.5 Xref: usenetserver.com comp.databases.oracle.server:432639 X-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 10:46:21 EDT (text.usenetserver.com) DA Morgan wrote: > Alexander Skwar wrote: >> DA Morgan wrote: >> >>> If you used RMAN, which you should have, RMAN does a logical check for >>> you. If you didn't use RMAN then reconsider your backup strategy. >> >> Maybe he has and maybe he came to the conclusion, that RMAN isn't >> required? As you know, there are such situations - but you'll of >> course happily ignore this. >> >> Alexander Skwar > > Backups are not required. Archive logging is not required. Neither is > brushing your teeth. But all are very good ideas. That's true. I'm not going to argue against that. I never did. But what does this have to do with what I wrote? Alexander Skwar