Path: text.usenetserver.com!out02b.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in01.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!newsfeed.gamma.ru!Gamma.RU!news.mi.ras.ru!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news1.greatnowhere.com!news1.greatnowhere.com!195.13.230.46.MISMATCH!reader.greatnowhere.com!not-for-mail Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 12:47:14 +0200 From: "Martin T." <0xCDCDCDCD@gmx.at> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server Subject: Re: Jobs do not run References: <46b334e9$0$1348$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com> <1186151990.729745.108850@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <46b34b2d$0$1345$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com> <5sp6b3t10bcnovsj77cpri8iaptrtkbbbr@4ax.com> <46b6b8e9$0$1340$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Leafnode: relayed by 'Robin Hood' X-Comments: 'Robin Hood' admin contact MaxxDrv@gmail.com Lines: 64 Message-ID: <46b99fe1$0$1346$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com> NNTP-Posting-Date: 08 Aug 2007 10:50:09 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: fe361dc0.reader.greatnowhere.com X-Trace: DXC=do5AoklRGdJM8TNgnjo4NJ]XKbj2VKD@Jn1RJ3gdIg\K?=EWaeQnMjAa>Bhg?8A`bDnklmRkW\`2CN On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 07:55:06 +0200, "Martin T." <0xCDCDCDCD@gmx.at> > wrote: > >> sybrandb@hccnet.nl wrote: >>> Comments embedded >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:30:51 +0200, "Martin T." <0xCDCDCDCD@gmx.at> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> The problem only exists in our test db instance (at the moment) >>>> >>>> I fully expected you and Daniel to tell me that. (Given the fact that >>>> there are 7 patch sets we haven't even looked at it might even have some >>>> foundation.) >>> All patch sets are cumulative >>>> Let's for a moment assume we were running Oracle 10g2 with the newest >>>> patch and hit this. What would you propose except calling Oracle? >>> a) The most common cause for jobs not running is forgetting to commit >> I know this. That you replied it to my OP just goes to show that you did >> only read "jobs" and "...0.1" and then shouted something at me. >> >>> b) the problem doesn't exist in 9.2.0.8 >>> >> Interesting ... which crystal ball told you that? >> I tell you what: it also does not exist in 9.2.0.1 on 40 other machines >> with the same HW and SW setup. It also did not exist on this machine >> prior to one week ago. >> >> Well whatever. >> >> regards, >> Martin > > 'Mr' T, > > What clues did you provide other than: it doesn't work? > I will tell you : NONE. Oh. Saying that we tried everything in Metalink note 313102.1 is NONE info now? That I know that CJQ0 is running but not doing anything? As I said - you should read the postings of the people you bark at more carefully. > What will Oracle tell when you submit a SR? > 'You are not on 9.2.0.8, we are not going to help you. Upgrade to > 9.2.0.8'. Subsequently they will close the call. > Which is exactly why I did not submit an SR. > How do I know the problem doesn't exist in 9.2.0.8.? BY EXPERIENCE. > Fair enough. > Next time when you want to waste someone's time, PLEASE GO SOMEWHERE > ELSE, will you? In a Kindergarten for example. > This coming from someone who's got less manners than any Kindergarten children I've ever had the pleasure to talk with. cheers, Martin