Path: news.f.de.plusline.net!news-fra1.dfn.de!newsfeed.hanau.net!news.tiscali.de!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!proxad.net!64.233.178.134.MISMATCH!postnews.google.com!x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: joel garry <joel-garry@home.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: execute crs root.sh error
Date: 29 May 2007 14:04:13 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <1180472652.905565.130710@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
References: <1180140178.899017.171710@n15g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
   <f3a2gk$dsp$1@news5.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>
   <1180224639.782976.300970@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <f3bmic$94l$1@news2.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.49.200.201
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1180472691 32482 127.0.0.1 (29 May 2007 21:04:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 21:04:51 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <f3bmic$94l$1@news2.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: 1.0 ISA2K4-OC1
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.49.200.201;
   posting-account=YRNZ5wwAAAAg-yYjMFwy3FyWUbPiwNdq
Xref: news.f.de.plusline.net comp.databases.oracle.server:198729

On May 27, 3:29 am, Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> robertchen...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> On the first node, no error, but on the second node:
> >>> [root@rac2 ~]# /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/crs_1/root.sh
> >> Why do you actually use mount points like /u01?
> >> OFA is a state of mind, not something to be followed to
> >> the letter.
>
> > Many people do use mount points like /u01 /u02 etc.
>
> It looks that way - but the question was; why? We're not in the
> time OS'es support 8-dot-3 names and nothing more, anymore.
>
> I'd expect something more useful. And I never understood
> the names anyway.
> /u01/app makes you believe there must be something else
> possible in /u01; db, perhaps? Nope, according
> to Oracle, that should be under $ORACLE_HOME (yuk!)
>
> In short: why /u01/app, and not /applications.
> Why oracle/product (asif someone would use oracle/database).

See table 1-7 in http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/pdf/A70110_01.pdf
/u[0-9][0-9] are user data directories.  Note this was before SAME.
Long, long before.
.../product means distribution directories.  Perhaps they meant things
like forms executables.  There was a time one would edit .INP files...

So how many multiplexed redo files have been lost due to being named
*.log since then?  :-)

I used to print out table 1-8 since so many places would have their
own odd variants of directory structures, often to include something
about backups... note you _could_ have something besides oracle under
app... and home for a user is different than home for the db, that
only varied to $OH/dbs because, er, "some things" didn't follow OFA...

And of course, there is a post on oracle-l somewhere where Cary Milsap
doesn't like the 10g OFA...

jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
http://news.com.com/Intel+Software+needs+to+heed++Moores+Law/2100-1012_3-6186765.html?tag=nefd.top

