Path: news.f.de.plusline.net!news-fra1.dfn.de!newsfeed.hanau.net!news.tiscali.de!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!proxad.net!216.239.36.134.MISMATCH!postnews.google.com!n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "joel garry" Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server Subject: Re: RMAN backups to NFS OR FS 'snapshots' Date: 3 Apr 2007 15:47:17 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 23 Message-ID: <1175640437.733079.216030@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.49.200.201 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1175640439 12993 127.0.0.1 (3 Apr 2007 22:47:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 22:47:19 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: 1.0 ISA2K4-OC1 Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.49.200.201; posting-account=YRNZ5wwAAAAg-yYjMFwy3FyWUbPiwNdq Xref: news.f.de.plusline.net comp.databases.oracle.server:195718 On Mar 30, 10:49 am, NetComrade wrote: > For those who run backups to NFS > > a) which device do you use.. with digiliant, and emc ax100, we haven't > rearched much beyond 25megs per second (that's 9i, 10g with > compression is faster) > b) have you ever had corruption problems? we recently had a corrupt > lvl0, which I thought was difficult to 'achieve' over a tcp mounted > nfs is it mounted hard and nfsver=3? Like rw,bg,intr,hard,timeo=600,wsize=32768,rsize=32768,nfsver=3,tcp (per Jeff Hunter blog) See http://kevinclosson.wordpress.com/2007/01/02/oracle-over-nfs-emc-and-network-appliance-truth-telling/ and http://nfs.sourceforge.net/nfs-howto/ar01s05.html jg -- @home.com is bogus. "The Supreme Court spanked the EPA." - Jerry Brown