Path: news.f.de.plusline.net!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-stu1.dfn.de!news.germany.com!multikabel.net!feed20.multikabel.net!newshub2.home.nl!newshub1.home.nl!home.nl!not-for-mail
From: Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bortel@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: Delayed block cleanout causing ora-1555?
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 10:41:24 +0100
Organization: @Home Benelux
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <ese45k$hu0$1@news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>
References: <XDCFh.4039$Tg7.2752@trnddc03> <es7d9g$68o$1@news4.zwoll1.ov.home.nl> <2YGdneZyZ-wGf3TYRVnyjgA@pipex.net>
Reply-To:  frank.van.bortel@gmail.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: cc28855-a.hnglo1.ov.home.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl 1173001204 18368 82.75.117.80 (4 Mar 2007 09:40:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@corp.home.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 09:40:04 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
In-Reply-To: <2YGdneZyZ-wGf3TYRVnyjgA@pipex.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2
Xref: news.f.de.plusline.net comp.databases.oracle.server:194938

Niall Litchfield schreef:
> Frank van Bortel wrote:
>> Chuck schreef:
>>> Oracle 9.2.0.7
>>>
>>> Is there any way determine authoritatively if an ORA-1555 "snapshot too
>>> old" error was caused by delayed block cleanout? I suspect it is
>>> happening on overnight processing but am not 100% sure. The query starts
>>> at 2am and failed at 3:30. Undo retention is 7 hours so that's not the
>>> problem, and a query of v$undostat for that time period shows only about
>>> 1g of undo being written during that time. The undo tablespace is 4g.
>>>
>>> TIA
>> There was a recent discussion where an ora-01555 occurred during
>> an export - similar undo retention and undostats. One comment
>> was that in 9i, undo retention is not guaranteed.
> 
> It was my comment, and yes that's correct
> 
>> Another option is an other session, that uses commits in a loop,
>> during an update.
> 
> or indeed the overnight batch process itself committing frequently in a
> loop.
> 
> 
> 
As Chuck mentions "the query starts at 2 am", I ruled out the
option of updates, but maybe "query' is a more generalized
term for Oracle processes of any type where he lives; English
is not my native tongue, so every now and again, I misunderstand
or misinterpret things.

-- 
Regards,
Frank van Bortel

Top-posting is one way to shut me up...
