Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad01!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:11:13 -0700
From: DA Morgan <damorgan@psoug.org>
Organization: Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: Oracle RAC newbie
References: <1154890261.146977.114080@n13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1154999517.164864.259300@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <1155001588.712389@bubbleator.drizzle.com> <jKmdneYEveqmvUXZnZ2dnUVZ8tKdnZ2d@bt.com> <pan.2006.08.08.12.58.15.832195@sbcglobal.net> <J3oLH0.98A@igsrsparc2.er.usgs.gov> <E42Cg.5686$uo6.3425@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com> <1155054296.973784@bubbleator.drizzle.com> <J3ozv9.7nM@igsrsparc2.er.usgs.gov>
In-Reply-To: <J3ozv9.7nM@igsrsparc2.er.usgs.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1155067873.290578@bubbleator.drizzle.com>
Cache-Post-Path: bubbleator.drizzle.com!unknown@oracle.advtechserv.com
X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
Lines: 77
X-Complaints-To: abuse@csolutions.net
Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.databases.oracle.server:272395

Brian Peasland wrote:
> DA Morgan wrote:
>> Mladen Gogala wrote:
>>> Brian Peasland wrote:
>>>>> It's usually a good practice to ask for references and check them. 
>>>>> Oracle
>>>>> sales person will probably be able to compile the list of similar
>>>>> configuration in your general area. If he can't - don't buy, you
>>>>> definitely do not want to be one and only owner of that unique
>>>>> configuration within a 100 miles radius. 
>>>>
>>>> Why within a 100 miles radius? In today's Internet-connected world, 
>>>> I communicate with many DBA's all around the globe, even in this 
>>>> forum! I do not need to be physically colocated with the person I am 
>>>> exchanging knowledge with.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Brian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Brian, support is the problem here. If you are the only one within a 
>>> wide area, the company that sold you the disk array will likely not 
>>> have a support person close by, so you will have to contact Elbonia 
>>> for tech support. Also, Oracle will not have anybody particularly 
>>> well versed in
>>> your neighborhood, so in case you need it, you will have to wait for 
>>> somebody to be flown into your area. This world is a global village, 
>>> but the local user groups are still there for a reason. That reason 
>>> is usually not marketing perpetrated by the Oracle Corp. and its 
>>> affiliates during annual events. Those local luser groups are 
>>> organized for mutual
>>> support purposes. Oracle usually tries to use luser attitude 
>>> readjustment  tools on them.
>>
>> With some reservations I am going to disagree. Most organizations have
>> purchased their disk from EMC, Fujitsu, Hitachi, LSI, NetApp, etc. and
>> these vendors may not be supporting RAC in the area but they certainly
>> have the resources to make available if required.
> 
> That has been my experience as well. I would add that I work as a 
> contractor to the fed govt and our Oracle needs are all funneled through 
> the Washington DC area. So if I need to talk with my Oracle rep, I have 
> to call his DC-area phone. And who knows where my Metalink analyst is 
> physically sitting these days.
> 
> Our vendors are pretty good about getting us the support we need. Maybe 
> that's due to the amount of dollars we spend on their products...I don't 
> know. Sometimes we do have to push and prod them, but I expect that to 
> be the same no matter where you are.
> 
>> My only reservation is with EMC as I have found them to often have a
>> knee jerk reaction to the word Oracle and immediately point to metalink.
>> Good product but I am not thrilled with their support team.
> 
> I fully agree with your assessment of EMC, but I do have other 
> reservations with EMC. They came in on a real low price point when we 
> purchased disk from them many years ago. After our first maintenance 
> contract expired, the cost of renewing that maintenance contract was so 
> high, that it would have been cheaper to buy new replacement disk, which 
> is precisely what they were strong arming us into doing. They figured 
> they had their foot in the door and could rake in the big bucks. I guess 
> they forgot that as a govt facility, we have procurement rules to follow 
> and they didn't get the new disk bid. Ouch. And I am much happier with 
> our current disk vendors.
> 
> Cheers,
> Brian

And likely the tax payers would be happy too if they knew about it. ;-)
-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan@x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org
