Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews.google.com!b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "joel garry" <joel-garry@home.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: ODBC Pass Through SQL to Oracle Express 10g
Date: 3 Jul 2006 11:42:10 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <1151952130.565061.37240@b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <monia2lil1ibappu1qd06ctti19borevnm@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.116.125.178
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1151952134 11303 127.0.0.1 (3 Jul 2006 18:42:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 18:42:14 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <monia2lil1ibappu1qd06ctti19borevnm@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: 1.0 ISA2K4-OC1
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=67.116.125.178;
   posting-account=YRNZ5wwAAAAg-yYjMFwy3FyWUbPiwNdq
Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.databases.oracle.server:270267


Greg Strong wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I don't know if this is an appropriate topic here, but I'll ask the
> question. Maybe one of you can help. I've been banging my head on this
> one for a while.
>
> I'm experimenting with using Access 2k2 as a front end to Oracle
> Express. I am creating 10 tables using pass through DDL queries. The
> PROBLEM is the general format of the VB code WORKS on the 1st 6 tables
> created, then an error is thrown which I can't find much help on. I've
> compared the code on the 7th table to earlier ones which are successful,
> and the general format is the same. It seems the more you try, the
> quicker the problem is created. Re-booting fixes the problem, but the
> error always 1st occurs on the 7th table with subsequent tries occurring
> quicker. On subsequent tries I always drop the tables with cascading
> constraints and a purge. The specifics are below. Any ideals?
>
> Thanks!
>

Metalink Note:135313.1 says nested transactions are not supported with
ODBC, and shows how to simulate with savepoints.  It refers to
Microsoft Knowledge Base Q177138
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q177138  which
basically says, tough, unless you use the Jet engine.

But I wouldn't know anything about it.

jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
Needs a bigger pipe:  http://blog.wired.com/27BStroke6/?entry_id=1512499

