Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews.google.com!v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: dananrg@yahoo.com
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: Python vs. PL/SQL for Oracle work
Date: 3 Mar 2006 07:26:26 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <1141399586.274946.289010@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>
References: <1140263528.821122.323610@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <pan.2006.02.18.21.38.52.433062@telus.net>
   <pan.2006.02.18.22.21.58.546075@sbcglobal.net>
   <pan.2006.02.19.00.06.41.894305@telus.net>
   <pan.2006.02.19.03.59.11.650863@sbcglobal.net>
   <pan.2006.02.19.04.17.33.951545@telus.net>
   <pan.2006.02.19.04.22.31.78083@sbcglobal.net>
   <1140717030.094698.140420@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <pan.2006.02.23.22.11.50.503927@telus.net>
   <1141306632.822815.308130@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>
   <pan.2006.03.02.13.55.52.209717@telus.net>
   <1141311464.456063.184200@t39g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>
   <1141365844.849079.64160@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.90.217.38
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1141399592 27058 127.0.0.1 (3 Mar 2006 15:26:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 15:26:32 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1141365844.849079.64160@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com; posting-host=199.90.217.38;
   posting-account=0KeQ4AwAAACWv0BNvnh715yXFY4KHq_X
Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.databases.oracle.server:262702

>I could go on and on.  I often do.

This is the time and the place to do so. Thanks for chiming in Paul.
:-) I'm looking forward to kicking the tires on PostgreSQL and PostGIS.

I too have had concerns about the ArcSDE repository, how things are
managed, and the potential for data corruption. Of course corruption
may happen mostly with ArcSDE if people do silly things with it.
However, it's all to the good to have a product be as least-prone to
corruption as possible. I'm glad there are competitors raising the
proverbial spatial database bar.

Dana