Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!drn.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-10!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: DA Morgan Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server Subject: Re: NAS for Oracle redo logs Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 11:47:51 -0700 Organization: Ye 'Ol Disorganized NNTPCache groupie Message-ID: <1123516061.720314@yasure> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cache-Post-Path: yasure!unknown@67.136.137.87 X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Lines: 13 Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.databases.oracle.server:249109 Mark A wrote: > Anyone have any reservations or concerns about using NAS (Network Attached > Storage) for Oracle redo logs in a high volume OLTP environment? None whatsoever depending upon what you consider high volume. I can tell you from personal experience no issues were created running at 21,000 inserts per second. -- Daniel A. Morgan http://www.psoug.org damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)