Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!drn.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews.google.com!g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: bbulsara23@hotmail.com Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server Subject: Re: Why is "shutdown abort", then backup bad Date: 8 Aug 2005 03:48:28 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 42 Message-ID: <1123498108.933069.279200@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <3VvIe.35387$Tk6.23363@trnddc02> <1123408025.362448.68300@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <1123490284.007541.77840@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.134.13.122 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1123498114 25218 127.0.0.1 (8 Aug 2005 10:48:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 10:48:34 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: G2/0.2 Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.134.13.122; posting-account=kY7g0gwAAAAtwbzJjx-D0SudGq8ZHXa6 Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.databases.oracle.server:249079 > Mladen Gogala wrote: Comments in-line Mladen. > These unhelpful responses have almost always been justified and they keep You may be able to justify unhelpful responses. You cannot justify rude responses. There is a difference. I object to rude responses. You wrote a rude response Mladen Gogala. > the group readable. Problem that you are avoiding is the attitude that one > doesn't need to make intellectual effort to learn things, but just ask any You are twisting words to suite an argument I am not arguing. The crux of my argument, and I have repeated it many times throughout the thread, is that you Mladen Gogala wrote RTFM. The problem I have, if I have one, is that you and others believe you can justify writing RTFM or worse. You cannot! The problem you have is that you can't see what my objection is. This is despite me writing it several times. I don't know how I can put it any simpler. Barry Mladen Gogala wrote: > On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 01:38:04 -0700, bbulsara23 wrote: > > > I know! I have been in this groups for a few years too! As well has > > posting many extremely useful answers, Syband has posted more than his > > fair share of rude unhelpful responses too. Many many unhelpful > > responses. > > These unhelpful responses have almost always been justified and they keep > the group readable. Problem that you are avoiding is the attitude that one > doesn't need to make intellectual effort to learn things, but just ask any > question here and it will be politely and expediently answered. I find it > desirable to suppress such an attitude by sometimes reminding people of > the skill called "reading". > > -- > http://www.mgogala.com