Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: QQQ
On 14 Jul 2005 10:29:12 -0700, soalvajavab1_at_yahoo.com wrote:
>Is calculations on an indexed column make index unused? is there any
>solution?
Yes. Has always been the case. Use function based indexes depending on
version and edition
>
>Does UNION better than OR? what about NOT EXISTS and HAVING
>
Please read the performance and tuning manual for your version
>Is LIKE make index unused too? what we can do for that?
Please read the performance and tuning manual for your version
>
>What's the pros and cons of using subqueries instead of JOIN?
Please read the performance and tuning manual for your version
>
>Can we disable an index by concatenating a null or 0 to the column
>name?
>
Depending on version. The current versions of the CBO will notice the calculation is redundant and ignore it.
>if we need more that 20% of the rows in the table is FTS is better?
You could easily calculate the amount of I/O involved depending on
actual statements
>
>what exactly bind variable help in performance? is it really bifg deal
>or not?
Quoting Thomas Kyte
If I would have to write a book on 'How to build an unscalable Oracle
application', the first and last chapter would be entitled 'Do not use
bind variables'
-- Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBAReceived on Thu Jul 14 2005 - 14:35:51 CDT
![]() |
![]() |