From: "NormaJean S" <forum@DBMonster.com>
Subject: Re: Need MERGE without UPDATE clause
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 21:54:09 GMT
References: <50F02DE291C40@DBMonster.com> <42CD3ACC.6060@yahoo.com>
Organization: http://www.DBMonster.com
Message-ID: <50FB89AC2F830@DBMonster.com>
X-Abuse-Report: http://www.DBMonster.com/Uwe/NB/Abuse.aspx
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.32.72.34
X-Trace: advenet.com 1120773249 216.32.72.34 (7 Jul 2005 17:54:09 -0400)
Lines: 16
Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!drn.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!feed.news.tiscali.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed.kamp.net!news.jgaa.com!advenet.com!not-for-mail
Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.databases.oracle.server:246812

Connor McDonald wrote:
>> I have a question regarding the MERGE statment.
>> Can I do a merge with no update clause?
>[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>>      VALUES ( S.TIME_ID ,S.STORE_ID ,S.REGION_ID,S.PARTS ,S.SALES_AMT ,S.
>> TAX_AMT ,S.DISCOUNT);
>
>10g, the clauses become optional

thanks, but we are not on 10g yet for this instance.   I followed Mark's
advice, and it worked like charm.


-- 
Message posted via DBMonster.com
http://www.dbmonster.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/oracle/200507/1
