Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!drn.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sn-xit-04!sn-xit-12!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: DA Morgan Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server Subject: Re: 10g RAC design options Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 06:48:38 -0700 Organization: Ye 'Ol Disorganized NNTPCache groupie Message-ID: <1120744146.773310@yasure> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <42cd1186$0$7902$892e7fe2@authen.white.readfreenews.net> In-Reply-To: <42cd1186$0$7902$892e7fe2@authen.white.readfreenews.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cache-Post-Path: yasure!unknown@oracle.advtechserv.com X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Lines: 17 Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.databases.oracle.server:246769 Fabrizio wrote: > I like both: opteron and linux but unfortunately too many issues has > been reported on RAC for x86-64. in partivular have a look at the > suse-oracle mailing list archive. > > RAC for x86-64 doesn't seem ready for production and oracle is not > providing a great support on that platform :( > > We are still waiting 10.1.0.4 patchset! Your issues are SUSE: Not x86-64. I've seen few, if any, issues with RHEL. -- Daniel A. Morgan http://www.psoug.org damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)