Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!drn.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews.google.com!f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: tonij67@hotmail.com Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server Subject: Re: Oracle question from a Sys. admin, re: Solaris performance Date: 3 Mar 2005 15:01:17 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 12 Message-ID: <1109890877.083084.73020@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> References: <1109883311.791239.242560@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.2.10.242 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1109890881 17152 127.0.0.1 (3 Mar 2005 23:01:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 23:01:21 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/0.2 Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.2.10.242; posting-account=hzkZ9A0AAACXjr3Q4oO79cVKWEQkYvW2 Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.databases.oracle.server:237412 >But then please tell me, how come, when you are in this situation, you >don't have any users of the other 49 instances yelling at you and >screaming for your scalp? Or have they been trained to treat the lousy >performance as 'fact of life'? I think you are confusing my environment with the example I stated; the 4 instance example is from an article I found online, we do not have anyone yelling at anyone here about performance. Yet. I only pointed it out because the general consensus was "your crazy for having more than one Oracle instance on a system". I have 50+ so naturally it interests me.