Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!drn.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed.multikabel.nl!news2.euro.net!216.196.110.149.MISMATCH!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feeder.enertel.nl!nntpfeed-01.ops.asmr-01.energis-idc.net!newshub3.home.nl!newshub1.home.nl!home.nl!not-for-mail
From: Frank van Bortel <fvanbortel@netscape.net>
Newsgroups: comp.databases,comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: Beginner help needed in database design
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 22:36:22 +0100
Organization: @Home Benelux
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <ctrh1m$f6s$1@news5.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>
References: <ctakrl$3pm$1$830fa7a5@news.demon.co.uk> <1106842617.933021@yasure> <Xns95ECCDB3EC0E5znzn122eduinvalid@216.196.97.131> <ctlsgn$nr3$1@news4.zwoll1.ov.home.nl> <1107199784.292798@yasure> <ctocan$mtd$1@news5.zwoll1.ov.home.nl> <ctom21$ak5$1@ls219.htnet.hr> <ctqf0h$2ln$1@news1.zwoll1.ov.home.nl> <QtOdnWafs-MIap3fRVn-pQ@comcast.com>
Reply-To:  fvanbortel@netscape.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: cc28855-a.hnglo1.ov.home.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news5.zwoll1.ov.home.nl 1107380086 15580 212.204.168.125 (2 Feb 2005 21:34:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@corp.home.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 21:34:46 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <QtOdnWafs-MIap3fRVn-pQ@comcast.com>
Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.databases:43240 comp.databases.oracle.server:234842

Mark A wrote:
> "Frank van Bortel" <fvanbortel@netscape.net> wrote in message
> news:ctqf0h$2ln$1@news1.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
> 
>>SSN is a prime example is a technical key. Why is
>>it people do not have a problem recognizing me by name,
>>but computers do?
>>-- 
>>Regards,
>>Frank van Bortel
> 
> 
> That is not true. Names are not unique (maybe yours is). For most people,
> there is another person somewhere with the same exact name. Not true with
> social security name or employee number (at least it is intended that these
> are unique).
> 
> 
Even when I was called John Doe (which is a common name
in the US of A, I believe), people know me. The name
may not be enough, but the features of my face, along
with the name certainly do.
And if that's too hard to understand/program for computers
and uniquely identify me, how about my birth date, my father's
and mother's names, and their birth dates? Or the fact I write
to this ng, and have been doing that for about 10 years now?

Chances are smaller than the number of people on this
planet, that is not unique.

But - it is not compact; in the times memory was scarce
it surely would not have been acceptable. So, take a number.
Nice and easy, small, and guaranteed to be unique on top of
it all. And we call it: number.
And as this particular number was invented by the (US) Social
Service, let's call it a Social Security Number.

I don't have one, but I live in a country with a civilized
social security system :^) I've other numbers attached to
me...

But that is what a technical key is: a meaningless
number (BTW: is SSN really meaningless, or is it coded?),
instead of (mostly many) fields, together making up a
unique identifier.

-- 
Regards,
Frank van Bortel
