Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: RAID 5 vs RAID 10 benchmark

Re: RAID 5 vs RAID 10 benchmark

From: Bruno Jargot <see_at_reply-to.invalid>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 20:28:31 +0100
Message-ID: <1gnvkn8.59mfua1rzpu5sN%see@reply-to.invalid> 





Frank van Bortel <fvanbortel_at_netscape.net> wrote:



> Basic message: RAID10 (or 1+0) is *safer* than RAID5,

> because you can *never* loose 2 disks in RAID5 without

> serious disruption (involving restoring of backups).




With an array of 7 disks in RAID 5 and 1 disk in spare, you're living
dangerously only for the duration of the array rebuild.
I think this configuration has a pretty good redundancy / price rapport.
Received on Fri Nov 26 2004 - 13:28:31 CST












Original text of this message













  HOME |
  ASK QUESTION |
  ADD INFO |
  SEARCH |
  E-MAIL US