Re: Serious article on comparison between MS SQL Server 2005 Yukon and Oracle 10g

John Miller wrote:

> Very good paper! Learned a lot. Frankly, I didn't see the comparison
> between 10g and Yukon yet. This is a first one and such detailed!!
> Great work.
> I would recommend developers of Oracle and SQL Server to read this.
> You have to pay $$ for this kind of documentation, but WisdomForce
> giving this away, which is nice.
>
> John

Why would you say that you "learned a lot" when it contains huge errors of fact clearly demonstrating that the authors do not understand the subject matter at a level necessary to do the comparison in the first place?

For example ... they don't understand the difference between TAF and cold failover ... they compare RAC to SQL Server when the actual comparison should be DataGuard to SQL Server.

If I didn't have such a big mouth you'd have left me speechless.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)