Re: Default optimizer_index_caching value DUMB ...

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 19:31:43 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <cmgkeu$i0e$1@hercules.btinternet.com>

Note in-line.

-- 
Regards

Jonathan Lewis

http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ

http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html
Optimising Oracle Seminar - schedule updated Sept 19th





"Niall Litchfield" <niall.litchfield_at_dial.pipex.com> wrote in message 
news:1099668063.964495.137880_at_z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...


>

> A relevant metalink note (62286.1) would suggest that Oracle intend the

> value to be considered for in-list as well as NL.

>


Amazing - there is a similar reference for optimizer_index_cost_adj.
They both went public in 8.0.5 ! If you'd asked me cold, I would
have sworn they didn't appear until 8.1.

Received on Fri Nov 05 2004 - 13:31:43 CST