| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: pct_increase is null
"Anthony Hogan" <ahoganXX_at_XXinerza.com> wrote in message
news:ci9qbc$4l0$1_at_nsnmpen3-gest.nuria.telefonica-data.net...
>
> <Kenneth Koenraadt> escribió en el mensaje
> news:41486415.694500_at_news.inet.tele.dk...
> > On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:52:05 +0100, "Anthony Hogan"
> > <ahoganXX_at_XXinerza.com> wrote:
> >
> > >8.1.7 on windows 2K professional.
> > >
> > >Hello All,
> > >I have been examining dba_tables on an instance in preparation for
> migration
> > >to 9.2. The curious thing is that the pct_increase value is null for
all
> > >tables in the (third party) user schema. No errors appear in the logs.
> > >I must admit I'm at a loss as to how exactly this came about: AFAIK
alter
> > >table (storage pctincrease) will not accept null. It's possible that
> someone
> > >(another dba) modified the data dictionary.
> > >I propose altering the value to 0 using alter table...
> > >
> > >Do you have any comments on:
> > >a) the possible cause of the null values
> > >b) my proposed solution
> > >c) how on earth the instance is still upright??
> > >
> > >TIA
> > >Anthony Hogan
> > >
> >
> > Hi Anthony,
> >
> > a)The null value is almost certainly inherited from the tablespace(s)
> > in which the tables reside. And those tablespaces are almost certainly
> > locally managed , auto-allocated type.
> >
> > auto-allocation locally managed tablespaces have pct_increase NULL,
> > because the next extent size is calculated by oracle and unpredictable
> > by nature (though you can observe the extent sizing follow a certain
> > pattern, Oracle does not guarantee that pattern to hold).
> >
> > Don't try to change the storage parameters for the tables, cause you
> > can't. And you probably don't need to.
> >
> > b) No problem => No solution needed.
> >
> > c) Your database is, at least regarding the pct_increase issue,
> > perfectly healthy.
> >
> > - Kenneth Koenraadt
> >
> D'oh.
> Spot on Kenneth! Thank you .
>
> Anthony
>
>
I agree. Received on Thu Sep 16 2004 - 02:30:28 CDT
![]() |
![]() |