Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!drn.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!transit.nntp.hccnet.nl!reader.nntp.hccnet.nl!not-for-mail From: Sybrand Bakker Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server Subject: Re: MTS and Memory Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 23:50:21 +0200 Reply-To: sybrandb@hccnet.verwijderdit.nl Message-ID: References: <4140adc5$0$27888$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 11 Organization: HCCnet Nieuwsgebruiker NNTP-Posting-Date: 09 Sep 2004 21:50:20 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.251.38.205 X-Trace: 1094766620 reader10.nntp.hccnet.nl 765 62.251.38.205:3908 X-Complaints-To: abuse@hccnet.nl Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.databases.oracle.server:224625 On 9 Sep 2004 19:29:51 GMT, Chuck wrote: >Because when you switched to MTS, they moved out of the dedicated server >and into the SGA. The SGA therefor needs to be bigger. The OP already has a 400 M large pool and a 200 M shared pool, and he still wants to crank up memory. Or didn't you read that bit? -- Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA