Re: db_buffer performance

From: Vince Laurent <vincelaurent_at_REMOVETHISsbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 15:06:08 GMT
Message-ID: <t7pbj0d5f15d7llk0kcfgptvurs2osvg6v@4ax.com>

On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:48:47 -0700, Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote:

>Why did you change it?

SAP recommendation. The recommendation seemed to work juts fine on the failover server (PSS). Both PRD, our production server and PSS are hardware/software identical. The only difference is the number of users.

>Why don't you change it back?

SAP support

>What problem are you trying to solve?

Data loads for our HR project. One of our loads took nearly 72 hours. After the changes it was under 6.

>What made you think this was the solution?

SAP consulting.

"I am mortified to be told that, in the United States of America, the sale of a book can become a subject of inquiry, and of criminal inquiry too." - Thomas Jefferson Received on Wed Sep 01 2004 - 10:06:08 CDT