Re: Two instances with same SID in a same machine

From: Hans Forbrich <forbrich_at_yahoo.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:15:10 GMT
Message-ID: <ODGYc.74758$X12.67381@edtnps84>

Jeff wrote:

> In article <iVGXc.19635$A8.1896_at_edtnps89>, Hans Forbrich
> <forbrich_at_yahoo.net> wrote:

>>Jeff wrote:
>>
>>> I say "fleas on the same dog" makes for an apt analogy apropos of this
>>> thread.
>>> If you call the dog, which flea jumps? grin
>>>
>>
>>Since you haven't given either an ID, you can't tell them apart. You need
>>to dig into your kitbag to eliminate the duplicates & redesign your model.
>
> You don't name your dog's fleas?! :-)

Please, please, please,
Of course I name my dog's fleas!
Yup, that's right - I sure do
I name them Flea-One and Flea-Two.

And when I call to those fleas,
I hope you will notice, please,
that Flea-One does not come when I call
"Flea-Two" ... and that's not all.

When I don't want to talk to Flea-Two,
as on occasion I'm sure you do to,
I simply call Flea-One by name
and he'll answer, alone, just the same.

But if I just simply called out "hey you", then both would respond, and then two
fleas would try to cross o'er the line
e'en when only one would do just fine.

What would really cause me much grief,
and everyone else disbelief,
is the total chaos and confusion
and utter mental contusion
that would arise if I called them the same or even worse, gave them no name,
'cause then I couldn't tell 'em apart
or fix 'em when the dog did ... scratch?          Received on Mon Aug 30 2004 - 09:15:10 CDT