Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: my problem with
I did run explain plan and with first query I had :
Statement Id=5 Type=COUNT
Cost=0 TimeStamp=30-08-04::15::37:22
(1) SELECT STATEMENT HINT: FIRST_ROWS Est. Rows: 1 Cost: 107.847.126 (7) SORT ORDER BY Est. Rows: 1 Cost: 107.847.126 (6) FILTER
(2) TABLE TABLE ACCESS FULL Table1 [Analyzed]
(2) Blocks: 3.210 Est. Rows: 209.907 of 209.907 Cost: 717
Tablespace: USERS
(5) FILTER
(4) COUNT STOPKEY (3) INDEX (UNIQUE) INDEX FULL SCAN Field1 [Analyzed] Est. Rows: 209.907 Cost: 532
and with better second query :
Statement Id=7 Type=INDEX
Cost=117 TimeStamp=30-08-04::15::34:51
(1) SELECT STATEMENT HINT: FIRST_ROWS Est. Rows: 10 Cost: 1.791 (13) SORT ORDER BY Est. Rows: 10 Cost: 1.791 (12) NESTED LOOPS Est. Rows: 10 Cost: 1.790
(9) VIEW VIEW SYS.VW_NSO_1
Est. Rows: 10 Cost: 1.780 (8) MINUS (4) SORT UNIQUE Est. Rows: 10 (3) COUNT STOPKEY (2) INDEX (UNIQUE) INDEX FAST FULL SCAN Field1 [Analyzed] Est. Rows: 209.907 Cost: 117 (7) SORT UNIQUE Est. Rows: 1 (6) COUNT STOPKEY (5) INDEX (UNIQUE) INDEX FAST FULL SCAN Field1 [Analyzed] Est. Rows: 209.907 Cost: 117
(11) TABLE TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID Table1 [Analyzed]
(11) Blocks: 3.210 Est. Rows: 1 of 209.907 Cost: 1
Tablespace: USERS (10) INDEX (UNIQUE) INDEX UNIQUE SCAN Field1 [Analyzed] Est. Rows: 1
You see, first time there is : (2) TABLE TABLE ACCESS FULL Table1
[Analyzed] and (7) SORT ORDER BY
and this is problem.
You didn't understend what I need. User of my application have to see records in order by Field1 but only records with first 50 values of that field, that's meen records with value from '000001' to '000050' You can try to insert records in nonsequenced order and you will see that.
Does you now is any oracle command that I say database to use index in some query?
> > Did you run explain plan and compare the 2 plans? No? Your answer is > in the explain plan. > Also, there is no such thing as 'first 50 rows' as tables are the > representation of a set, and sets are unordered. Your approach is > likely to fail sooner or later. > > > -- > Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBAReceived on Mon Aug 30 2004 - 08:57:33 CDT
![]() |
![]() |