I see what you mean. Yup, makes perfect sense.
--
Cheers
Nuno Souto
wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam
"Howard J. Rogers" <hjr_at_dizwell.com> wrote in message
news:40a0c48b$0$440$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> >
> > Is it possible to expand it for non-unique indexes?
>
> Not sure what you mean. The indexes used in the actual worked examples
> were non-unique (in declaration, if not in content).
>
> And the Clustering Factor calculation would not change any (ie, *how* it
> is calculated: if I follow this index entry, what table block do I have
> to visit...Oh, stone me it's the same as the last visit I made,
> therefore I won't count it etc etc).
>
Received on Tue May 11 2004 - 07:38:43 CDT
