| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Doing some housekeeping -- is this legit?
Ed Stevens wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 07:20:46 +1000, "Howard J. Rogers" > <hjr_at_dizwell.com> wrote: > >
> > > Well, I'm not planning on moving anything just yet, if at all. I was > really looking for some more serious issues, like obvous user tables, > but was mildly surprised to find these segments in there. I just > checked an 8.1 db I created a couple of weeks ago on a Solaris system. > I created it using DBCA (or whatever it was called in 8.1) and the > only thing I did post-creation was change the default tablespaces for > all users (which were all created under DBCA). That DB has 48 > segments owned by either OUTLN or SYSTEM that are in the SYSTEM > tablespace.
It's been that way for ages and ages (well, OUTLN was only invented in 8i, but you get my point!).
Put it this way, the only two users that absolutely have to exist regardless of version from the word go in every Oracle database are SYS and SYSTEM. Likewise, the only tablespace that positively has to exist, regardless of version, is SYSTEM. It's therefore not a major surprise (or drama, frankly) that SYSTEM (the user)'s tables end up being stored inside SYSTEM (the tablespace) -and have done so since time immemorial.
Regards
HJR
Received on Fri Apr 30 2004 - 08:07:14 CDT
![]() |
![]() |