Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Any thoughts?
Sybrand Bakker wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 12:49:04 +1000, "Howard J. Rogers" > <hjr_at_dizwell.com> wrote: > >
> > > > Which does confirm his TUSC relationships ;-)
Oh, the TUSC relationship is irrelevant really, except that I would have thought they would have been the first people to turn to, and their ideas might have been of interest in their own right (which is why I asked the question). It shouldn't stop someone being able to ask a question here, just because they happen to be associated with TUSC, just as it shouldn't if someone works for Oracle (!). On the other hand, he (presumably) has access to some of the more publicised experts in the Oracle publishing world, so one wonders whether they are stumped on the matter, or have even ever been asked about it.
What really makes it difficult to provide any answer here is the lack of any substance to the question. I mean, is session logical reads always bigger than consistent gets+db block gets, or always smaller, or does it vary, and if it's one way or the other, what is he doing on the database at the time, and what's the version he's using in the first place, and on what O/S, and so on?
And also, why is it important to know anyway? I mean, what's the problem being solved here? What piece of DBA work is stymied because of the inconsistency?
I've studied a number of V$ statistics that "sound" like their supposed to add up to some other statistic, but never do. I tend not to lose much sleep over it, unless it poses a quantifiable (and practical) problem, because Oracle internals are, well, Oracle internals.
Regards
HJR
Received on Fri Apr 30 2004 - 00:51:58 CDT
![]() |
![]() |