Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: can Oracle 9i be installed in a non-top level directory
Joel Garry wrote:
> thick_guy_9_at_yahoo.com (AMIT) wrote in message news:<7e127df6.0404091018.658cebc1_at_posting.google.com>...
>
>>hi >>I am thinking of installing Oracle 9i on Red Hat Linux 8.0 on x86. >>Due to some constraints with my existing linux partition scheme (all 4 >>primary partitions are used up), I will not be able to allicate a top >>level partition to Oracle - i.e I can't create /u01,/u02,/u03,/u04 >>partitions. >> >>I do have space on /home. Can i create /home/u01,... and install? Or >>will creating a symbolic link from /u01 (under /) to /home/u01 be a >>better alternative? >> >>Thanks
If you are going to install the same version of Oracle on more than a few servers in your organization (for example, version 8.1.7, 9.2.0, etc), it would behoove you to standardize on one location, such as:
/opt/oracle/product/9.2.0
/u01/app/oracle/product/9.2.0
d:\oracle\oracle92 [Windows]
These are just examples, YMMV.
When you install Oracle using the installer, the ORACLE_HOME is hard-coded in several locations, and difficult to change by hand after the fact (and definitely not supported by Oracle Corp). Under Unix, soft links work fine for meeting a standard such as this. I also recall a "soft link" utility available under W2K server....
The reason for choosing a standard location is that for any scripts, LISTENER.ORA files, and so on that reference the ORACLE_HOME setting, you can much more easily migrate or fail-over or what-have-you to different servers, without breaking your existing configuration.
Where you put your database datafiles is a completely different issue, although the OFA standard also addresses that. Once again, a standard that allows for different servers and more than one database per server is a good idea.
--Mark Bole Received on Fri Apr 09 2004 - 19:58:39 CDT
![]() |
![]() |