Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: 9.2.0.5 is available for win32 (now AIX)
One of our dba's installed it without a glitch on AIX5L (5.2) (Bull
hardware)
The only thing she mentioned was that it took some time for the installer to
get
the dependencies (30min).
No ORA-600's ...we went from 9204 to 9205.
... our favorite bug - filesystemio_options finaly fixed ;-)
"Dusan Bolek" <pagesflames_at_usa.net> wrote in message
news:1e8276d6.0404050354.4a95a689_at_posting.google.com...
> Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message
news:<1081006651.655924_at_yasure>...
> > The only other substantive thing I can say is that one of my
> > consulting clients (AIX 5L) reported a corrupt tools tablespace
> > within a day or two of applying it: But that could just be
> > coincidence.
>
> That's a quite interesting information. Our DBA tried to install
> 9.2.0.5 on AIX5L (64bit) and was not successful at all. Installation
> of software went OK, but the database was unable to start giving
> ORA-0600 after issuing a startup migrate statement.
> The same behaviour showed even if we created a new database using
> 9.2.0.5 software. We filled an iTAR, but Oracle guy assigned to it is
> not very responsive.
>
> > I'd suggest watching metalink for awhile and not applying it
> > unless it specifically fixes a known problem.
>
> Well, because of really huge list of bugfixes in this patchset, I
> think that almost anyone can find "his" bug inside. I found two from
> my bug list (MERGE vs. standby and TEMP tables vs. redologs). And the
> situation is even worse, because we're using DataGuard + RAC and there
> is at least ten or more critical bugs (hangs, corruptions, even a
> potential data loss) targeted in this patchset. So for us is hard to
> stay out and watch what will happen with this patchset.
>
> --
> Dusan Bolek
>
> Email: spambin_at_seznam.cz
> Pls add "Not Guilty" to the subject, otherwise your email is going to
> be burnt as a SPAM.
Received on Mon Apr 05 2004 - 08:51:52 CDT
![]() |
![]() |