Re: New feature

"Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:c4hhia$ao8$1_at_titan.btinternet.com...
|
| "Hans Forbrich" <forbrich_at_yahoo.net> wrote in message
| news:ltXac.4421$hH3.4221_at_edtnps84...
| > Mark C. Stock wrote:
| >
| > >
| > > "Hans Forbrich" <forbrich_at_yahoo.net> wrote in message
| > > news:N7Xac.4414$hH3.3538_at_edtnps84...
| > > | Mark C. Stock wrote:
| > > |
| > > | >
| > > | > "Glen A Stromquist" <glen_stromquist_at_no_spam_yahoo.com> wrote in
| > > | > message news:JwWac.4061$hH3.3709_at_edtnps84...
| > > | > | Daniel Morgan wrote:
| > > | > |
| > > | > | > Jonathan Lewis wrote:
| > > | > | >
| > > | > | >> This only works if you set hidden parameter
| > > | > | >> _unbreakable = false
| > > | > | >
| > > | > | >
| > > | > | > But to get that to work don't you also have to set
| > > | > | >
| > > | > | > _dba = expendable
| > > | > | >
| > > | > | I just tried another undocumented feature,
| > > _dba_auto_pay_increase=TRUE,
| > > | > | on our financial system.
| > > | > |
| > > | > | I'll keep you all posted....
| > > | > |
| > > | > |
| > > | >
| > > | > there is a posted bug on that feature (available only via the
| MetaLink
| > > | > Classic interface, and only for 12z beta testers) that indicates
it
| > > | > does not handle NULLs properly
| > > | >
| > > |
| > > | When I checked, the reference was that _dba_auto_pay_incr_rate had
to
| be
| > > set
| > > | and could not be left null. Otherwise the increase rate was
| > > | indeterminate (leading to the black hole of tri-valued logic).
| > > |
| > > | BTW ... From what I can tell, it's best to set
_dba_auto_pay_incr_rate
| > > | to
| > > a
| > > | multiple of DB_CACHE_SIZE to get optimal DBa performance.
| > > |
| > > |
| > >
| > > you need to do a little more testing, i'm pretty sure the
recommendation
| > > is an exponent of DBA_CASH_SIZE
| > >
| > > ;-{ mcs
| >
| > It surely seemed like a typo. Your analysis makes more sense ... and
ties
| > in closely with the (undocumented) definition of the
_dba_cash_size_target
| > parameter
| >
| >
|
| Is that covered in the Oracle Wallet documentation ?
|
|
|

No, unfortunately, not, as it was already overstuffed (due to unexpected deallocations from ORACLE_USER_WALLET).

;-{ mcs Received on Thu Apr 01 2004 - 11:02:43 CST