Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: DBMS_STATS compared to the analyze command: weird!

Re: DBMS_STATS compared to the analyze command: weird!

From: Syltrem <syltremzulu_at_videotron.ca>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:08:29 -0500
Message-ID: <CBq%b.249$Xy3.806@tor-nn1.netcom.ca>


There is a (generic) bug for which I installed a patch:

Patch 1407738
Description DBMS_STATS.GATHER_SCHEMA_STATS GIVES ORA-6502 WITH STALE/EMPTY

It does not mean the stats are incorrect or that one should stay away from DBMS_STATS though.

-- 
Syltrem

OpenVMS 7.3-1 + Oracle 8.1.7.4
http://pages.infinit.net/syltrem (OpenVMS related web site, en français)
---zulu is not in my email address---
"Daniel Morgan" <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> a écrit dans le message de
news:1077818071.139873_at_yasure...

> Cookie Monster wrote:
>
> > As a point of interest we had a consultant from Oracle in for a few days
to
> > tune our 8.1.7 database on solaris and he told us NOT to use the
DBMS_STATS
> > package to analyze the scheme. He pointed to a number of bugs and
problems
> > and suggested we continue to use the analyze table method for statistic
> > gathering (seems problems are resolved in later releases). I do this
using
> > a stored procedure. Maybe you want to consider that??
> >
> > Regards,
> > Cookie.
>
> I've seen no evidence that your consultant's advice is correct. Can
> you point to anything specific?
>
> --
> Daniel Morgan
> http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
> http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
> damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
> (replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)
>
Received on Thu Feb 26 2004 - 12:08:29 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US