Re: How to calibrate the CBO

Hello Howard,

  Again, sorry that we are disagree. I reject to continue this spam thread.

Regards,

  Ron
  DBA Infopower
  http://www.dbainfopower.com
  Standard disclaimer:
http://www.dbainfopower.com/dbaip_advice_disclaimer.html

"Howard J. Rogers" <hjr_at_dizwell.com> wrote in message news:402da2bc$0$28872$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
>
>
> "Ron" <support_at_dbainfopower.com> wrote in message
> news:0oSdnTtmVpqGCLDdRVn-gw_at_comcast.com...
> >
> > Hello Howard,
> >
> > Sorry, that you are displeased that my correct answers and were not
up
> to
> > your high standards :-)
>
> They were incorrect. It needs to be said, even though you won't
acknowledge
> it.
>
> > I truly believe then we provide user with the correct information
>
> You didn't. You offered incorrect advice regarding archiving and backups,
> and your proposed solution for reading the alert log via an external table
> would have resulted in truncated lines which would render the entire
> exercise pointless. That is not "correct information". It is erroneous and
> misleading information. And still you won't admit it.
>
> >and
> > right direction.
>
> Well, if you can call misinformation pointing someone in the right
> direction, then I suppose so. I prefer to call a spade a spade, however.
You
> were not helpful to anyone wanting to know about archiving and how backup
> and recovery works, and you were not exactly helpful to someone wanting to
> read their alert log via a select statement, assuming they'd like to read
> all of it and not just 80-character lines of it.
>
> >I agree, that it was not 100% spoon feed solution,
>
> Spoon fed? You didn't feed them at all. That is the point.
>
> >but this
> > was not my intention. I prefer teach how to fish.
>
> Then teach them how to fish properly, with accurate information and
> understanding of Oracle. By your own admission, you've posted to this
group
> for just a couple of days. You have already botched the process of giving
> decent advice twice. You have already felt able to pass judgement on
people
> who have been giving extremely accurate advice here for months and months
> and months. That is a pretty poor beginning in my book, and doesn't come
> under the rubric of teaching people how to fish at all. Not even close.
>
> > I believe life shows who is prospering and benefit other people with
> what
> > they know and achieve and who is flaming others on a newsgroup forums.
>
> Your beliefs are irrelevant. You have offered two pieces of lousy advice.
> And you have felt yourself qualified to pass judgement on others you
barely
> know. I believe that says something about you, not about me or anyone
else's
> propensity to flame. It says you don't know what you're talking about, but
> like to think you do.
>
> > At this point, please, lets stop flaming and continue helping people.
>
> You stop the flaming, then, and I'll continue to help people with
accurate,
> useful advice. You could try doing likewise.
>
> > If you don't like my posts please ignore them,
>
> That is one thing I won't do. When you tell people (incorrectly) that 'in
> the worst case, you restore from the last backup', that is not only wrong,
> but it is dangerous. It's also breath-takingly ignorant, but that's
another
> matter. I can't ignore you, because its misinformation like this, spread
by
> people like you, that I cannot afford to let stay on the public record
> without challenge. Read Richard's post again: its crappy advice like yours
> that people like he and I have to pick up the pieces from when they come
> into a training room, their heads full of garbage.
>
> >but let not make out of
> > this newsgroup our personal battleground - this is spamming.
>
> Your unfounded pontification about the merits of Richard's critique of Don
> Burleson's article is what started this. You stop the spamming, improve
the
> quality of your advice, and I won't have a problem with you in the future
at
> all.
> HJR
>
>
Received on Fri Feb 13 2004 - 22:51:49 CST