Re: Buffer cache statistics (ratios) and CBO SQL optimization?

From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: 12 Jan 2004 17:17:26 -0800
Message-ID: <73e20c6c.0401121717.15e0857f@posting.google.com>

joel-garry_at_home.com (Joel Garry) wrote in message news:<91884734.0401121142.7b017290_at_posting.google.com>...

> As in so much of law, it depends on what "is" is.
>
> http://www.nolo.com/lawcenter/ency/article.cfm/objectID/315FE0E9-D6B6-479B-A8005EED919D3D5F/catID/E0F4D2E1-6217-4672-BF69F022655C5D6C

Precisely. It's hard to make "libel" become a synonym to "injury"...

> See 3B, first paragraph:
> http://www.isoc.org/isoc/conferences/inet/99/proceedings/3e/3e_2.htm

Once again, define where libel (unproven) = injury.

Last time I looked, pointing out that something in a technical book or product is incorrect is FAR from being considered libel. It would be interesting to see who could prove the opposite in court. AFAIK, no one yet has been able to.

Which puts this entire "legal" discussion in perspective: Nothing more than a paranoia attack. Received on Mon Jan 12 2004 - 19:17:26 CST