Re: number of redolog groups

From: Robert <_at_tref.nl>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 09:48:24 +0100
Message-ID: <bqcaup$kld$1@reader08.wxs.nl>

Frank wrote:

> Robert wrote:

>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there any reason to have more than two redolog groups in NOARCHIVE LOG
>> mode?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>>

> Lots - and achivelog or noarchivelog has little to nothing to
> do with it. Ever lost your redolog group?
> 
> Archivelog mode merely means Oracle will create a uniquely named
> copy of (one of) the archive log file(s).

So what coul dbe the reasons ? I can imagine that when in Archive log mode you need to be sure to have finished the archiving before switching back to the group being archived, all will hold if not.

But when NOT in Arch mode then this can't occur. So why still have more then two groups ? Received on Sun Nov 30 2003 - 02:48:24 CST