Hi,
HAve you looked at the cost? I think shareplex also needs a lot of
maintenance and lot of things need to be done on both the source and
target and there are performance problems from time to time.
Thank you
pagesflames_at_usa.net (Dusan Bolek) wrote in message news:<1e8276d6.0311260023.41ab920a_at_posting.google.com>...
> "Rodrick Brown" <rbrown@[remove]doitt.nyc.gov> wrote in message news:<ukVwb.281759$pT1.95725_at_twister.nyc.rr.com>...
> > Anyone using either of these replication technologies and can tell me the
> > pros/cons of why you went with either one.
> >
> > We are currently a 8i shop. So please reframe from the use oracle
> > replication option.
>
> We used SharePlex not for everyday replication, but for replication
> during migration 8.1.6 -> 9.2. I must say that experiences were quite
> impressive. This soft did exactly what we need to, so we were quite
> happy with it. We lowered needed offline time to almost nothing.
Received on Wed Nov 26 2003 - 12:30:00 CST
