Path: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!rip!news.webusenet.com!feed2.newsreader.com!newsreader.com!newshosting.com!news-xfer2.atl.newshosting.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail
From: "Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan@jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: How to identify whether or not client session get ORA-1652 of TEMP in RAC.
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 20:52:40 -0000
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <boriaa$eqc$2$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk>
References: <2d15bd69.0311051955.736efc8f@posting.google.com> <bonilh$ipa$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk> <2d15bd69.0311102342.79638850@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: jlcomp.demon.co.uk
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1068584074 15180 158.152.75.41 (11 Nov 2003 20:54:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 20:54:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
X-Priority: 3
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Xref: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com comp.databases.oracle.server:247468


Watch out for the latching.

When a session is resumable, it records every
call in a  view called v$resumable_session (or
similar) which has to be a latch-protected area
of the SGA.  Consequently you might see latch
contention in a highly concurrent system - but
I haven't checked to see which latch it might be.



--
Regards

Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

  The educated person is not the person
  who can answer the questions, but the
  person who can question the answers -- T. Schick Jr


One-day tutorials:
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/tutorial.html
____Belgium__November (EOUG event - "Troubleshooting")
____UK_______December (UKOUG conference - "CBO")


Three-day seminar:
see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html
____UK___November


The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html


"wangbin" <wangbin@start.com.au> wrote in message
news:2d15bd69.0311102342.79638850@posting.google.com...
> Thanks Jonathan. It works. Amazing. I even don't need "after
suspend"
> trigger.
>
> Without resumable, 1652 will been generated in alert.log whenever
> reassignment happens. When I enable resumable with a timeout of 1,
> only 'real' 1652 apears in alert.log, the reassignment ones
disappear.
> So all I need is an "LOGON ON" trigger to enable resumable.
>
> Well, I'm not sure about the side-effects. I will put it into test
env
> see how it goes.
>
> Regards,
> Bin
>



