Path: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!prodigy.com!news-out.triton.net!triton.net!newsfeeder.triton.net!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-01!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: Daniel Morgan <damorgan@x.washington.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: Why don't we have a charter
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:42:40 -0800
Organization: ATS
Message-ID: <1068583381.429052@yasure>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <a8497ec7.0311040845.115c2ef9@posting.google.com> <1068184734.635327@yasure> <6ZNqb.244$KN4.128503@news1.news.adelphia.net> <n0nrqvoe0lmovmo30u3c15rsg3cd12qcgl@4ax.com> <3FB07AB4.6487DBB@yahoo.net> <3fb07ed9$0$16012$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <3fb07ed9$0$16012$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------020201070806070105040508"
Cache-Post-Path: yasure!unknown@pond178.drizzle.com
X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 171
Xref: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com comp.databases.oracle.server:247465
--------------020201070806070105040508
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Howard J. Rogers wrote:

>"Hans Forbrich" <forbrich@yahoo.net> wrote in message
>news:3FB07AB4.6487DBB@yahoo.net...
>  
>
>>"Jaap W. van Dijk" wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>My suggestion: why isn't there a charter with aims of the newsgroup
>>>and behavioural rules that is posted regularly in the newsgroup (once
>>>a day, once a week?) like I have seen in other newsgroups?
>>>
>>>Jaap.
>>>      
>>>
>>Ummmmmm - there is a charter.  it's been around for a loooooong time.
>>The vote to create the 5 groups cdo/cdo.{tools misc server marketplace}
>>took place December 1996.  Prior to that there was a published charter
>>for cdo [comp.database.oracle].
>>
>>To find the charter and the aims of the groups, all a person really has
>>to do is use a search engine and enter 'comp.databases.oracle charter'
>>to get the first part of your request answered.  (Is it really necessary
>>to post it regularily?)
>>
>>As far as posting behaviour suggestions, I really don't think this
>>newsgroup wants behaviour any different than any other newsgroup.  That
>>means the standard 'Emily Post' stuff is valid - again, anyone could use
>>a search engine and enter 'newsgroup etiquette' and get the answer.  (If
>>we start posting the netiquette, I'm sure we'll get into the top/bottom
>>post wars - again!)
>>
>>I really don't understand why we would need to post that information
>>regularly.  Is internet searching really all that complicated that
>>people can't do it on their own?
>>
>>/Hans
>>    
>>
>
>I vote for a short, sharp FAQ that says:
>
>"The following groups are available... and this is what they are used for...
>
>Then: visits these sites and do some searching before posting a question
>(and then list tahiti.oracle.com, google.com, jlcomp and asktom. Add other
>sites if people clamour for it).
>
>Then : Never post without details of an operating system and an Oracle
>version, because answers are often frequently highly-version dependent."
>
>Anything longer than about 15 lines isn't going to be worth the bother.
>
>And that would be about it. I agree that for the rest, commonsense and
>standard netiquette should prevail.
>
>Regards
>HJR
>  
>
I'm with Howard. Short, sweet, to the point, and the only thing I'd add 
is the note Sybrand
posted to someone earlier today ... 'look up your own error messages' 
and perhaps mention
of the fact that we will give hints to students but not do their work 
for them.

-- 
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan@x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)


--------------020201070806070105040508
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
  <title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Howard J. Rogers wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
 cite="mid3fb07ed9$0$16012$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au">
  <pre wrap="">"Hans Forbrich" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:forbrich@yahoo.net">&lt;forbrich@yahoo.net&gt;</a> wrote in message
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="news:3FB07AB4.6487DBB@yahoo.net">news:3FB07AB4.6487DBB@yahoo.net</a>...
  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">"Jaap W. van Dijk" wrote:
    </pre>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <pre wrap="">My suggestion: why isn't there a charter with aims of the newsgroup
and behavioural rules that is posted regularly in the newsgroup (once
a day, once a week?) like I have seen in other newsgroups?

Jaap.
      </pre>
    </blockquote>
    <pre wrap="">Ummmmmm - there is a charter.  it's been around for a loooooong time.
The vote to create the 5 groups cdo/cdo.{tools misc server marketplace}
took place December 1996.  Prior to that there was a published charter
for cdo [comp.database.oracle].

To find the charter and the aims of the groups, all a person really has
to do is use a search engine and enter 'comp.databases.oracle charter'
to get the first part of your request answered.  (Is it really necessary
to post it regularily?)

As far as posting behaviour suggestions, I really don't think this
newsgroup wants behaviour any different than any other newsgroup.  That
means the standard 'Emily Post' stuff is valid - again, anyone could use
a search engine and enter 'newsgroup etiquette' and get the answer.  (If
we start posting the netiquette, I'm sure we'll get into the top/bottom
post wars - again!)

I really don't understand why we would need to post that information
regularly.  Is internet searching really all that complicated that
people can't do it on their own?

/Hans
    </pre>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->
I vote for a short, sharp FAQ that says:

"The following groups are available... and this is what they are used for...

Then: visits these sites and do some searching before posting a question
(and then list tahiti.oracle.com, google.com, jlcomp and asktom. Add other
sites if people clamour for it).

Then : Never post without details of an operating system and an Oracle
version, because answers are often frequently highly-version dependent."

Anything longer than about 15 lines isn't going to be worth the bother.

And that would be about it. I agree that for the rest, commonsense and
standard netiquette should prevail.

Regards
HJR
  </pre>
</blockquote>
I'm with Howard. Short, sweet, to the point, and the only thing I'd add
is the note Sybrand <br>
posted to someone earlier today ... 'look up your own error messages'
and perhaps mention <br>
of the fact that we will give hints to students but not do their work
for them.<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Daniel Morgan
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp">http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp">http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:damorgan@x.washington.edu">damorgan@x.washington.edu</a>
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)</pre>
</body>
</html>

--------------020201070806070105040508--

