Path: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!in.100proofnews.com!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!newspeer.radix.net!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: wangbin@start.com.au (wangbin)
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: How to identify whether or not client session get ORA-1652 of TEMP in RAC.
Date: 10 Nov 2003 23:42:03 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <2d15bd69.0311102342.79638850@posting.google.com>
References: <2d15bd69.0311051955.736efc8f@posting.google.com> <bonilh$ipa$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.48.79.199
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1068536524 11148 127.0.0.1 (11 Nov 2003 07:42:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 07:42:04 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com comp.databases.oracle.server:247430

Thanks Jonathan. It works. Amazing. I even don't need "after suspend"
trigger.

Without resumable, 1652 will been generated in alert.log whenever
reassignment happens. When I enable resumable with a timeout of 1,
only 'real' 1652 apears in alert.log, the reassignment ones disappear.
So all I need is an "LOGON ON" trigger to enable resumable.

Well, I'm not sure about the side-effects. I will put it into test env
see how it goes.

Regards,
Bin


"Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan@jlcomp.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<bonilh$ipa$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk>...
> Have a look at resumable sessions and the 'after suspend'
> trigger.  A 'real' 1652 will then put the session that has a
> problem into suspension and fire the after suspend trigger.
> Give it a timeout of (say) 10 seconds so that it really
> crashes the end-user afterwards, but make sure it logs
> the problem.  It is possible that a 'spurious' 1652 that
> can be resolved by extent reallocation will not cause a
> suspension.
> 
> Test carefully. I haven't tried setting sessions resumable
> en masse, so there may be odd side-effects - especially
> on a RAC system.
> 
> --
> Regards
> 
> Jonathan Lewis
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
>
