Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: number of redolog groups

Re: number of redolog groups

From: Sybrand Bakker <gooiditweg_at_sybrandb.nospam.demon.nl>
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 16:39:17 +0100
Message-ID: <tqnsqvgifnuol37fhndhvcenkji205nh1v@4ax.com>


On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:10:10 -0800, Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote:

>I see no point in having more than two groups.
>I see a lot of point in having more than two members to a group.
>Or am I having an attack of syntax dyslexia?

You have.
There is no point in having more than two members. There is a lot of point in having more than 2 groups, which is largely determined by how write-intensive your instance is.

--
Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
Received on Sun Nov 09 2003 - 09:39:17 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US