Re: Maximum number of transaction. (Newby question).

From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 08:54:25 -0000
Message-ID: <3fa22341$0$245$ed9e5944@reading.news.pipex.net>

"VC" <boston103_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:31e0625e.0310301017.286e88c_at_posting.google.com...
> Hello Niall,
>
> 1. The original poster 'desired' to see the situation wherein the
> locking phenomenon caused by paucity of ITL slots occurs, hence the
> 'desired' effect. The poster wanted eagerly(syn. desired) to educate
> himself through experimenting with Oracle. Of course, in a production
> environment, one usually does not 'desire' the above effect.
>
> 2. If it was an attempt to be funny, I apologize for my not getting
> the joke.

It was an attempt to reuse what I thought was an old joke. As neither you nor Ben picked up on this I clearly badly missed the target.

More seriously, this sort of experimenting is exactly the sort of thing that DBAs should have time and the energy to do IMO. It also occurs to me that, not for the first time, I might appear to be suggesting that looking at Block Dumps is a Bad Thing(tm). This isn't my view at all - I just don't think they are easy things to read.

-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission Uk

Received on Fri Oct 31 2003 - 02:54:25 CST