Note in-line
--
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
The educated person is not the person
who can answer the questions, but the
person who can question the answers -- T. Schick Jr
One-day tutorials:
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/tutorial.html
____Belgium__November (EOUG event - "Troubleshooting")
____UK_______December (UKOUG conference - "CBO")
Three-day seminar:
see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html
____UK___November
The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
"VC" <boston103_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:nrsnb.49322$e01.126151_at_attbi_s02...
> Hello Jonathan,
>
> You are quite right about 10ms being a reasonable number. The
original
> poster's timing, however, is closer to 100 ms and that's not an
indication
> of his Symmetrix good health.
>
The numbers I picked out were from the tkprof summary:
254 disk reads in 2.50 elapsed seconds
which is 100 reads per second
which is 10ms per read
It's easy to slip a decimal place with some of the numbers
that get dumped, especially when a few of them are given
in milliseconds anyway, but I think I got it right on this one.
Received on Tue Oct 28 2003 - 09:03:54 CST
