Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: rollback segments question

Re: rollback segments question

From: Maria <evoradba_at_yahoo.ca>
Date: 27 Oct 2003 20:03:46 -0800
Message-ID: <351fd9d6.0310272003.5ae5799c@posting.google.com>


Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:<1067277164.536028_at_yasure>...
> Maria wrote:
>
> >Hello all
> >
> >I have 2 oracle database servers verion 8.1.7.4 on solaris 5.8, which
> >I have the following rollback segements created:
> >
> >1) server #1
> >"create public rollback segment RBS15
> >tablespace RBS_TBS
> >storage (initial 80000K next 80000K optimal 1700000K MINEXTENTS 20
> >MAXEXTENTS 32765)"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >2) server #2
> >"create public rollback segment RBS20
> >tablespace RBS_TBS
> >storage (initial 40000K next 40000K optimal 80000K MINEXTENTS 20
> >MAXEXTENTS 32765K)"
> >
> >The tablespace is for #1 50GB and #2 40GB, my question is why is the
> >tablespace for the bigger rollback showing only 2% used while for the
> >smaller rollbacks is show 15% used. It should be the other way around
> >?
> >Can any one please help with this
> >
> >Regards
> >Maria
> >
> >
> Because that is how much they were used. The better question would be
> why, in spite of
> advice from industry experts such as Tom Kyte, are you using different
> sizings on your
> rollback segments and why, in spite of advice from industry experts not
> to are you using
> OPTIMAL.
>
> What you have here is a recipe for ORA-01555.

I was getting the ORA-01555 ROLLBACK too small too old that is when I re created them double of size, should I NOT be using OPTIMAL size then ?
Thank you
Maria Received on Mon Oct 27 2003 - 22:03:46 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US