| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Quick questions on direct insert, undo and parallel prosessing
Sybrand Bakker wrote:
>On 23 Oct 2003 11:09:00 -0700, jbradshaw777_at_yahoo.com (John) wrote:
>
>
>
>>As to the undo tbs, I sort of asociate it with AUM. And I don't seem
>>to see a lot of benefits in using AUM. So it makes me wonder why
>>ORACLE come up with this feature.
>>
>>
>
>To get rid of the need to have a DBA manage improperly sized rollback
>segments.
>Needless to say you still can use rollback segments, but why staying
>in the stone age? Use AUM and ora-1555 will be a thing of the past.
>
>
>--
>Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
>
>
Not to mention that while you can stay with rollback segments in 9i. You
won't have that option
thereafter ... so you might as well get with the program now.
-- Daniel Morgan http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)Received on Mon Oct 27 2003 - 11:35:44 CST
![]() |
![]() |