Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Quick questions on direct insert, undo and parallel prosessing

Re: Quick questions on direct insert, undo and parallel prosessing

From: Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 09:35:44 -0800
Message-ID: <1067276161.667154@yasure>


Sybrand Bakker wrote:

>On 23 Oct 2003 11:09:00 -0700, jbradshaw777_at_yahoo.com (John) wrote:
>
>
>
>>As to the undo tbs, I sort of asociate it with AUM. And I don't seem
>>to see a lot of benefits in using AUM. So it makes me wonder why
>>ORACLE come up with this feature.
>>
>>
>
>To get rid of the need to have a DBA manage improperly sized rollback
>segments.
>Needless to say you still can use rollback segments, but why staying
>in the stone age? Use AUM and ora-1555 will be a thing of the past.
>
>
>--
>Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
>
>

Not to mention that while you can stay with rollback segments in 9i. You won't have that option
thereafter ... so you might as well get with the program now.

-- 
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)
Received on Mon Oct 27 2003 - 11:35:44 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US