Re: SQLJ Desupport

From: Mladen Gogala <mgogala_at_adelphia.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 03:53:48 GMT
Message-Id: <pan.2003.10.27.03.53.46.895951@adelphia.net>

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 15:58:44 -0800, Daniel Morgan wrote:

> Does this mean SQLJ is dead? Not that I much care but if so ... what is
> replacing it, if anything?

No, it's not dead, it just smells funny. It is being replaced by perl DBI. Take a look at http://dbi.perl.org. Perl is portable, usually much faster then Java and has a huge programmers base. SQLJ was meant to be a Java version of PRO*C but nobody used it, because of Java bing so awkward. If you need quick thingies which will be portable and work withou compilation, perl is the ideal candidate.

-- 
None of us is as dumb as all of us.
(http://www.despair.com/meetings.html)

Received on Sun Oct 26 2003 - 21:53:48 CST