Path: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: norwoodthree@my-deja.com (NorwoodThree)
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: Oracle 9i + Death of the DBA
Date: 10 Oct 2003 13:08:13 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <ba03e2c.0310101208.74392356@posting.google.com>
References: <58e9f9da.0310091221.5204a95b@posting.google.com> <fshbovg52ffo9rvk70d7t8pi6b4ku6c52e@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.162.197.178
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1065816493 3016 127.0.0.1 (10 Oct 2003 20:08:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:08:13 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com comp.databases.oracle.server:245079

I whole-heartedly agree with the Larry statement and have witnessed
the comment first-hand.

I did hear something about Oracle re-vamping their "Standard Edition"
to address these needs in the marketplace, and to address the SQL
Server threat for smaller needs.  Should be interesting.