Path: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!pd7cy2so!pd7cy1no!shaw.ca!pd2nf1so.cg.shawcable.net!residential.shaw.ca!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: Sybrand Bakker <gooiditweg@sybrandb.nospam.demon.nl>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: Single-disk database and I/O load balancing?
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:16:24 +0200
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <eqtdovc4ci0ulk0g9q1adfrompsv7n3l8h@4ax.com>
Sender: Sybrand Bakker
Reply-To: postbus@sybrandb.demon.nl
References: <cf90fb89.0310100527.202279d8@posting.google.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 11
Xref: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com comp.databases.oracle.server:245064

On 10 Oct 2003 06:27:57 -0700, pharfromhome@hotmail.com (Geomancer)
wrote:

>But what about smaller systems on a single, large disk?

You are just begging to get in trouble, don't you. I assume those
'small' databases also run in noarchivelog.


--
Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
