Path: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!prodigy.com!rip!news.webusenet.com!peer01.cox.net!cox.net!newshosting.com!news-xfer2.atl.newshosting.com!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!skynet.be!skynet.be!newsfeed2.funet.fi!newsfeeds.funet.fi!nntp.inet.fi!central.inet.fi!inet.fi!read3.inet.fi.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "Jack" <nn@mail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
References: <bm2qs6$o1$1@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au> <8Bdhb.195$hV6.76@read3.inet.fi> <3f857214$0$28118$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <3Fehb.231$hV6.155@read3.inet.fi> <3f858a85$0$28118$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
Subject: Re: Oracle's Myth: keep tables and indexes in separate tablespaces
Lines: 21
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: <Yryhb.263$3u.180@read3.inet.fi>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:26:16 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.252.147.254
X-Complaints-To: abuse@inet.fi
X-Trace: read3.inet.fi 1065792376 194.252.147.254 (Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:26:16 EEST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:26:16 EEST
Organization: Sonera corp Internet services
Xref: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com comp.databases.oracle.server:245002


Look Howard what You did say at  23 Jun 2002 :
 LOL
------------------------------------------------
From: "Howard J. Rogers" <dba@hjrdba.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: Basic question on RAID array / Tablespace configuration.
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 00:33:46 +1000

There is precisely zero benefit in separating tables from their indexes for
performance reasons. Both are segments. Just like Table A and Table B are
both segments. Separate A from B by all means, but unless you're consistent,
there's no point in separating a table from its index.


Regards
HJR




